From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 2 22:31:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4235816A407; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E052043CA6; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 22:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.home (pooker.samsco.home [192.168.254.1]) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kB2MVTkJ001728; Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:31:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 15:31:29 -0700 (MST) From: Scott Long To: Craig Rodrigues In-Reply-To: <20061202210310.GB20693@crodrigues.org> Message-ID: <20061202152958.E20147@pooker.samsco.org> References: <200612021935.kB2JZuLd023097@repoman.freebsd.org> <4571D7FC.3030408@samsco.org> <20061202210310.GB20693@crodrigues.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Craig Rodrigues , cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/unionfs union.h union_subr.c union_vfsops.c union_vnops.c src/sbin/mount_unionfs Makefile mount_unionfs.8 mount_unionfs.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Dec 2006 22:31:45 -0000 What you committed works without the associated VFS changes? If not, why rush this commit in? Scott On Sat, 2 Dec 2006, Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2006 at 12:46:04PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: >> What about the VFS changes that were also made in the latest patchset? > > I'm looking at that change separately, and getting a few > other people to look at it too, before committing. > > -- > Craig Rodrigues > rodrigc@crodrigues.org >