From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 7 07:01:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBB4106566B for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:01:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C768FC16 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:01:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id KAA19223; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:01:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1NzPG1-000M5b-9I; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:01:01 +0300 Message-ID: <4BBC2DAB.2050704@icyb.net.ua> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:00:59 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100321) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aristedes Maniatis References: <1209800810.33861270466947931.JavaMail.root@dagobah.intersec.pl> <4BBA05A2.40706@intertainservices.com> <4BBA1823.1090305@gausus.net> <4BBA4334.1020506@interazioni.it> <4BBA4478.7030302@gausus.net> <20100405164306.hmy4n8pvs4goc8ks@www.goldsword.com> <4BBA51B9.6010803@gausus.net> <4BBC20BA.6090604@ish.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4BBC20BA.6090604@ish.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Maciej Jan Broniarz Subject: Re: fault tolerant web servers on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 07:01:11 -0000 on 07/04/2010 09:05 Aristedes Maniatis said the following: > Until we get to 'database' everything is HA and quite easy to build and > manage. Having a clustered database solution is expensive and beyond > most smallish budgets. mysql and postgresql don't have anything > available that is quite ready yet (IMO), so you'll need to be talking to > the bigger (expensive) players about their clustered offerings. Out of curiosity: have you considered MySQL Cluster: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MySQL_Cluster http://www.mysql.com/products/database/cluster/faq.html If yes, can you share your evaluation results? Thanks! -- Andriy Gapon