From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Oct 12 14:29:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133F837B503 for ; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 14:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id XAA22036; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:29:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA64161; Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:29:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 23:29:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: Garance A Drosihn Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Not that I want to be a pest, but let me try this proposal > one more time. If someone could tell me what is bad about > this proposal, I would like to hear it. I'd certainly settle on this proposal. But I'd be far more happy to simply make a port to disable telentd and all that. If the shit has to hit the fan, I'd do it myself, just to support the status quo. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message