Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:28:16 +1100 From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: possessor.assizer305@aceecat.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: List managers [Was: Link usability] Message-ID: <83596048-58FD-487E-85F0-4A4F15936D33@nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20230321192209.giqsnhqbl7ben6vk@beesty.loosely.org> References: <ca17a158b68d6cf2d0c261cc5f4268d5ef367482.camel@blues-softwares.net> <3faa3481-abe3-47cd-f273-2658db42a5bc@gmail.com> <11239785ba0531583f29189b133ceafdcded8aad.camel@blues-softwares.net> <ac194575-8e40-5e19-2478-a69fffbab278@freebsd.org> <5f1028aadd42bcbd89c62e843fc59798c52a0f36.camel@blues-softwares.net> <9B5F5E1E-555D-4FA8-AFBE-EBBD3A8A7045@nimnet.asn.au> <6eaa6e1f-af45-41f8-a5d7-2f03eb4f456a@freebsd.org> <A7E64A3C-2D9C-4368-ACC9-A81403C163EC@nimnet.asn.au> <20230321192209.giqsnhqbl7ben6vk@beesty.loosely.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22 March 2023 6:22:09 am AEDT, possessor.assizer305@aceecat.org wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:49:11PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > > > Ah, right. Yet another consequence of the regressive move from > > mailman plus pipermail to mlmmj is loss of clickable links in the > > archived messages. Duh! I guess (mark / copy / new tab / paste / go) instead of one click isn't too heavy, if it's only now and again ... > Out of curiosity, what was the rationale for the move? I wasn't there, and have only seen similar comments to Pete Wright's, plus some issues building both old and new versions with clashing directories (ono), and non- specific references to security issue/s, > My opinion: > Mailman has its warts but it's ubiquitous and well suited for > a world where almost everything has to be done in the browser > for $REASONS. Hopefully the reason wasn't just that a newer version existed and the older one had quit working after xteen years.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?83596048-58FD-487E-85F0-4A4F15936D33>
