From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Mar 4 12:12:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA13653 for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 12:12:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (cisigw.coppe.ufrj.br [146.164.5.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA13576 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 12:12:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonny@coppe.ufrj.br) Received: (from jonny@localhost) by gaia.coppe.ufrj.br (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09257 for hardware@freebsd.org; Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:12:35 -0300 (EST) (envelope-from jonny) From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis Message-Id: <199803042012.RAA09257@gaia.coppe.ufrj.br> Subject: TX Chipset and more than 64M Ram To: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wed, 4 Mar 1998 17:12:35 -0300 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, What kind of problem could I expect from FreeBSD if I run a TX chipset motherboard with 128M RAM ? This chipset can only cache 64M. Anything other than performance ? Is it possible to force FreeBSD to use the low 64M preferentially ? TIA, Jonny -- Joao Carlos Mendes Luis jonny@gta.ufrj.br +55 21 290-4698 jonny@coppe.ufrj.br Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro UFRJ/COPPE/CISI PGP fingerprint: 29 C0 50 B9 B6 3E 58 F2 83 5F E3 26 BF 0F EA 67 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message