From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jun 4 14:23:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from server1.mich.com (server1.mich.com [198.108.16.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A32537B512 for ; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 14:23:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@almanac.yi.org) Received: from almanac.yi.org (pm001-025.dialup.bignet.net [64.79.80.25]) by server1.mich.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA16784; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 17:23:05 -0400 Received: by almanac.yi.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4E37B1946; Sun, 4 Jun 2000 17:22:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 17:22:13 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Anatoly Vorobey Cc: Will Andrews , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An IA-64 port? Message-ID: <20000604172213.Q1993@argon.gryphonsoft.com> References: <39393DEF.B91727B0@tpts5.seed.net.tw> <20000604111222.C47877@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000604194323.A23321@happy.checkpoint.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000604194323.A23321@happy.checkpoint.com>; from mellon@pobox.com on Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:43:23PM +0300 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Jun 04, 2000 at 07:43:23PM +0300, Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > Do you mean just "you" or "anyone with -current"? I thought our binutils > (e.g. gas) had no IA-64 support. Has that changed? I mean you, Anatoly. I really don't have any clue how developed the IA-64 support is; I'm just assuming that because there's some code in there to support IA-64, some work is underway to support it. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message