From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 16:55:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665E816A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from alef.poprostu.pl (alef.poprostu.pl [195.116.86.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2AD43FB1 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 16:55:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from piero@poprostu.pl) Received: from beth.poprostu.pl (beth.poprostu.pl [213.25.228.183]) by alef.poprostu.pl (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id hAPIqs6H080232 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 19:52:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from piero@poprostu.pl) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:54:25 +0100 From: Piero To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031126015425.07267f7d.piero@poprostu.pl> In-Reply-To: References: <12675899.1069777110965.JavaMail.root@bigbird.psp.pas.earthlink.net> Organization: Poprostu X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Metacity with Expocity X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:55:50 -0000 On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:21:25 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:18:30 -0600 (GMT-06:00), Sean Welch > wrote: > > > I just saw this article: > > > > http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/25/0330208.shtml?tid=131&tid=179&tid=185&tid=189&tid=190 > > > > an took a look at the patch here: > > > > http://www.pycage.de/download/expocity-11-24-03.diff > > > > Figuring to give it a try, I got it to compile and install but > > the keystroke that is supposed to > > activate it (Alt-Tab) doesn't do anything now. Perhaps someone > > else might have a better > > idea what to do with it and how to track the problem down??? It > > did compile cleanly... > > > Because, it never has been patch clean if you read the messages of > patch. Looks like the diff was created against the CVS or > development version of Metacity. Or maybe older version of > Metacity, I dunno. > Yes, the original patch was supposed to work against the CVS version as noted at www.gnomedesktop.org: http://www.gnomedesktop.org/article.php?sid=1478 "If you want to try it out yourself, get the patch from here and apply it to the current CVS version of metacity." -- Piero piero@poprostu.pl