From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 4 9:12:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16845150DD for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:12:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id JAA98396; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199908041612.JAA98396@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: Panic plus advice needed In-Reply-To: <199908040936.TAA13368@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from Bruce Evans at "Aug 4, 1999 07:36:59 pm" To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bruce Evans writes: > >> >Any objections to the patch below? > >> > >> Yes. It bloats the kernel and only fixed one cause of the problem. > > > >What are the others..? > > The only one I can find now is naming the debugging kernel with a name > of different length. This causes different string lengths in config.c > and vers.c. I once thought I saw a problem related to linker sets, but > I was probably mistaken. So... IMHO, if we can fix this as well, it would be worth it for all the people who get core dumps but didn't build debug kernels. Do you disagree? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message