From owner-freebsd-mobile Sun Jun 18 17:44:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from wilson.acpub.duke.edu (wilson.acpub.duke.edu [152.3.233.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9132A37B73A for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 17:44:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sto@stat.Duke.EDU) Received: from bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu (bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu [152.16.67.15]) by wilson.acpub.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Duke-5.0.0) with ESMTP id UAA07161; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:44:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from sto@localhost) by bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA10115 for freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:44:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sto) Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2000 20:44:39 -0400 From: "Sean O'Connell" To: FreeBSD mobile Subject: Re: 4.0-RELEASE, Netgear FA410TXC, device timeout Message-ID: <20000618204439.H9791@stat.Duke.EDU> Reply-To: "Sean O'Connell" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Organization: House of Schmutzli X-Kitties: Bitty Maya CJ Keisha Jacob X-Hound: Bob X-OS-OF-Choice: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Warner noted the following: >In message <20000618202944.F9791@stat.Duke.EDU> "Sean O'Connell" writes: >: scp of a 17168KB file took 00:46 (accrding to ouput) with my >: old card, but it was claiming an ETA of 34:36 ... eek. this is >: all on a 10Mb hub. > >So is this good or bad. I don't understand what you are saying here. > >Warner Hi All- My apologies. That was truly incoherent. What I meant to say was that the file transfer took 00:46 using the Linksys EC2T card. However, the scp using the Linksys 10/100 card was reporting an ETA of 34:36 for the same transfer when it was at 2% finished. I think this is indicative of a real problem. S -- 1--------01---------01--------01--------01--------01--------01--------0 Sean O'Connell sean@stat.Duke.EDU To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message