From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 29 08:31:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2565C02940 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22b.google.com (mail-it0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68E72C9C for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:31:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id j69so69832851itb.0 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:31:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OMjDRfLVjHMHJjxsROTkn1EnxR1D7CAcOPC7oQbAgxA=; b=sCMYijuuRSsTqPHrau7sAKXYBLGNXdRT64uIpR8TkdfxYxeklZVZipY11nW3Vkg9NU 89LrAA01MYu6v7AMlH7KYsDePkVaf9nBsKym4v34NBArkALdmEncAYi57XdXtlYNOIII ll+BuDkiJu74oyow0DitKhgFuXrowwXPqStAa25rTWKpe/s2V9KNoP96L2JLznMqcAyV j0fw5d6c20a/UGlGq2FsQpaKPPyHuLjLTkCwTs7im2fmIKk/VvdyxDvM2leOrTfLyn6b x4xucumm/3Hm2oqtN7mlWY+hXkHKc6WJJJsnvVvVqZtUed7xDgArWgKuXxU7Ve6ozJAp GAWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OMjDRfLVjHMHJjxsROTkn1EnxR1D7CAcOPC7oQbAgxA=; b=TyL5hFLpKXl/FRZ7Yx4KJ3Gm6xxywtDewhvMaeH/AzElKJLw97t4Bp43ase2arU1ql DJIVmqkYoKegXCa/pOBAaf8prZRQTvIHEGquefcfYslpEqogI8p42bZ3OQu9/JtLsRJw VGeo22I1ySSR1lXyee6fqzdb72gVsOstOh64W3HWS0mBDRB08cdy066bBEG58uRags43 +oRpc1wAMyquGsJ+W7dsC515y7BKgG9dqDqSbXCFXAAIzSwlxAbk5ZiPTtm83Uw6OkUC pN4GME4T8kyzUZgDkyhEz9SXETuH4HjYiE33MMLk0tBTvZE+RUVBJF/3YH2AdxCjRk5A dosA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rnd4uIm7wnKtup7Qg5IdaXVgFDhMScEdpJiDuZa6kKD8kSySf9CFHlo+zN97FktUkCXhroazVOCaW7Dqg== X-Received: by 10.36.163.8 with SMTP id p8mr1587358ite.101.1475137899849; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:31:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.161.66 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:31:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201609290624.u8T6Ohd6028658@sdf.org> References: <201609280627.u8S6RfXq002303@sdf.org> <201609280718.u8S7IP85011693@sdf.org> <201609290624.u8T6Ohd6028658@sdf.org> From: blubee blubeeme Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 16:31:39 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Nvidia drivers screen brightness and back light To: Scott Bennett Cc: x11-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2016 08:31:40 -0000 I just tried "xset dpms force standby" the screen goes black for about 1 second and then it's back on. Here is a dmesg pastebinit : http://paste2.org/HhzBYG6H so that doesn't work with this hardware. Any other options? On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: > blubee blubeeme wrote: > > > I turned off redshift but xbrightness isn't needed; xrandr --output > DEVICE > > --brightness [0.0-1.0] works just as well without needing to install > > additional software. > > > > I wonder will this affect the ability to put this device to sleep in a > > power saving mode like suspend, hibernate, etc.. > > > On my system, "xset dpms force standby" works fine. > > > Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG > ********************************************************************** > * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * > *--------------------------------------------------------------------* > * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * > * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * > * -- a standing army." * > * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * > ********************************************************************** >