From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jan 30 9:57:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from winston.freebsd.org (adsl-64-173-15-98.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [64.173.15.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512D137B400 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:57:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.freebsd.org (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0UHuKd66506; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:56:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.freebsd.org) To: Terry Lambert Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp , Dallas De Atley , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __P macro question In-Reply-To: Message from Terry Lambert of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 02:18:00 PST." <3C57C858.5FCC9453@mindspring.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:56:20 -0800 Message-ID: <66502.1012413380@winston.freebsd.org> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > If the intent is no longer to act as a reference implementation > for various code, then perhaps we should reconsider and release > all of FreeBSD under the GPL, so it will be even more useless > as a use-agnostic reference implementation. > Well, now that we've gone into content-free mode I guess it's time to invoke Hitler and end this discussion.. :-) If I had any lingering dowbts about the advisability of going on a Jihad against __P(), Terry has managed to remove them. I think the next step is to decide on a schedule for axing them from -current, before 5.0 comes out. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message