From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat May  8 19:52:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B1616A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  8 May 2004 19:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFEB43D1F
	for <freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  8 May 2004 19:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl)
Received: from hammer.stack.nl (hammer.stack.nl
	[IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::153])
	by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7774B1F4F0;
	Sun,  9 May 2004 04:51:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by hammer.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333)
	id 8B64E6484; Sun,  9 May 2004 04:51:55 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 04:51:55 +0200
From: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
To: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
Message-ID: <20040509025155.GA4475@stack.nl>
References: <20040507092235.GA61837@stack.nl>
	<20040507100119.GA15782@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20040507235556.GB37035@empiric.dek.spc.org>
	<20040508010228.GA18935@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20040508012357.GA37547@empiric.dek.spc.org>
	<20040508030258.GA19512@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20040508044207.GB38736@empiric.dek.spc.org>
	<20040508070040.GA20138@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au>
	<20040508135954.GA469@stack.nl> <20040508150312.GA7381@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040508150312.GA7381@VARK.homeunix.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD hammer.stack.nl 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT
X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: Marc Olzheim <marcolz@stack.nl>
cc: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@www.freebsd.org
cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Unified getcwd() implementation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 02:52:25 -0000

On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 08:03:12AM -0700, David Schultz wrote:
> > standards/44425 mentions why the current implementation is not a bug in
> > the standards point of view.
> > 
> > bin/22291, kern/30527, kern/39331 and kern/55993 are about issues we
> > have because of the current implementation.
> 
> 30527 seems to be unrelated...

Erhm, sorry, that should've been 39527...

Marc