From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Aug 7 10:59: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ntlg.sibnet.ru (dns.sibnet.ru [217.70.96.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D399937B401 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 10:59:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from semenu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tlg5-ppp59.sibnet.ru (tlg5-ppp59.sibnet.ru [217.70.97.60]) by ntlg.sibnet.ru (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA14210; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 21:58:56 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 00:58:54 +0600 (GMT+6) From: "Semen A. Ustimenko" X-Sender: semenu@default To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Kernel stack size In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! Thanks for light speed response! On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > the kernel stack is a VERY LIMITED resource > basically you have about 4 or 5 Kbytes per process. Oops... And there is no hope to enlarge it? > if you overflow it you write over your signal information.. > That's what i'm seeing. SIGPROF, particulary. > you should MALLOC space and use a pointer to it.. > But this is loss of speed, isn't it? Bye! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message