From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 08:21:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D69316A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [193.30.224.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC37043D2F for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from pouet.in.mat.cc (pouet.in.mat.cc [193.30.224.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3CD4D086F; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:21:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:21:00 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Piotr Smyrak , perl@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <02BAD78FB8C4663C1E1FF3A8@[192.168.1.5]> In-Reply-To: <20050225001545.09220bec@smyru> References: <20050225001545.09220bec@smyru> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.0a5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: proposition regarding mail/p5-Mail-SpanAssassin X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:21:09 -0000 +-Le 25/02/2005 00:15 +0100, Piotr Smyrak a dit : | Dear Maintainers, | | I would like to ask for your opinion on the attached patch to | mail/p5-Spam-Assassin. It adds a knob WITH_SOCKET that enables | starting SA with Unix socket instead of IP port. | | This is might be helpful - besides myself - for people that want to | spare some megas of RAM, since socket SA keeps just two pids running | contrary to port SA that starts by default in summary 7 processes. I don't see the point of this, what prevents you from putting : spamd_flags="-c -d -r ${spamd_pidfile} --socketpath=/socket/path" in your /etc/rc.conf ? -- Mathieu Arnold