From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 09:10:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4285FF79; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x230.google.com (mail-ia0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38A7751; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f176.google.com with SMTP id i18so6359222iac.21 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:10:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MDsCPK/wpBBAA0Iv+b7B07tpnPVmd8QiZIizIwqB+Lo=; b=HBxTUhbSVce315Kf4+4wTRqosm6zsh5/gptf7nlzXl5q8Wx6Wtyx+Rv35s6lpMNp9u 7jlNeiFxzubpNOmNyWl7ht3RENZJRujuTr4D+fpKe/8KMnATBSnj+3FIF0ya+0DblUkO KDkFI9eqQbOOctmwcDbBipbiMYcHokp4HcFW3CfANWc5GaRr88bqd5QnQoPjJIJqxU6K 0melxB6/EIQyT9R5PbvBUlTQdGlzxLrcyMQ97eoe4qDPW7+m58XnAmMxcgGFTVu/mip8 JdJGSGurARhCmjBZiDQERx0sHKzjcMx3ah1VvCLW6/UX2ycjRrc3H6Yz+EE6n56rEOHz Yx7w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.152.132 with SMTP id uy4mr949368igb.62.1359796231483; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:10:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 01:10:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <510CAA71.3030906@freebsd.org> References: <201302020346.r123kLer085367@svn.freebsd.org> <510CAA71.3030906@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:10:30 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r311414 - head/www/pecl-APC From: Chris Rees To: Andrey Chernov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler , ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 09:10:32 -0000 On 2 Feb 2013 05:56, "Andrey Chernov" wrote: > > On 02.02.2013 8:47, Eitan Adler wrote:> IMHO this keeping of the wrong > version number is confusing and wrong. > > It makes it more difficult to determine which upstream version is > > being referenced. Further, for a user that knows that .14 was > > withdrawn it makes this port seems bogus. > > > > In this case nothing is wrong with PORTEPOCH and we should not have an > > allergy to it. > > > > > > I agree. Bumping PORTEPOCH is the right way. There is no 3.1.14 on > http://pecl.php.net/package/APC and people may have impression that it > is fake local version. > > Moreover you can't avoid PORTEPOCH bumping in any case when fixed 3.1.14 > will be re-issued. A PORTREVISION bump will be sufficient there. I won't comment on the epoch preserving, other than to approve in an OCD sense :) Chris