From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Oct 10 14:58:14 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937AA37B401
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC1543E9E
	for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 10 Oct 2002 14:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged))
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g9ALwCrL071732;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:58:12 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com)
Received: (from lowell@localhost)
	by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9ALwBU2071729;
	Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:58:11 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f
To: wolf <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx>
Cc: Marc Hunter <hunter@hunter.net>,
	questions <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ipfw and natd during internal to internal access ...
References: <4.2.0.58.20021010130144.00bc7a10@192.168.0.64>
	<3DA5E586.5000400@hq.dyns.cx>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Date: 10 Oct 2002 17:58:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3DA5E586.5000400@hq.dyns.cx>
Message-ID: <44zntm9css.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
Lines: 17
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

wolf <mjoyner2@hq.dyns.cx> writes:

> The request never hits the firewall rule for it to get diverted into nat.

Right.

> Though I am sure an additional firewall rule would probably work to fix it.

I agree.

> Maybe something like
> divert 8668 ip from 192.168/16 to 24.70.100.100
> divert 8668 ip from 24.70.100.100 to 192.168/16

I don't think so.

I think using the "forward" action of ipfw is the way to go.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message