From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 09:26:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2E916A40F for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F10D13C455 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gcubfg-freebsd-geom@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1H1fuR-0007hN-VI for freebsd-geom@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:26:15 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:26:15 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:26:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 10:26:08 +0100 Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <975053160612310913t3dadcc02yfac58f6fbf0a49df@mail.gmail.com> <20070102050151.GA90174@in-addr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060625) In-Reply-To: <20070102050151.GA90174@in-addr.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Recommended gmirror solution with swap? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 09:26:20 -0000 Gary Palmer wrote: > Except in the case where a drive holding some swapped out memory goes bad > and the system panics or crashes as a result. It might not make as > much sense for desktops, but if I were (still) building servers I'd > mirror everything that the system depended on to run. Well, yes... though the "only" things lost in this case are the processes using the swap :) But you're right in the general case.