Date: Wed, 15 Feb 1995 15:14:34 -0500 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Stephen Darragh" <stephen@belgarath.it.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Routing with subnets Message-ID: <9502152014.AA12499@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <m0reeIV-00020T5@belgarath.it.com.au> References: <m0reeIV-00020T5@belgarath.it.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 15 Feb 1995 15:37:15 +0800 (WST), "Stephen Darragh" <stephen@belgarath.it.com.au> said: > I want to have this route : > 203.8.116.40 203.8.116.4 UGSc 0 0 ed0 > (with netmask 255.255.255.248) > route traffic to 203.8.116.41/42/43/44/45/46 via 203.8.116.4 instead of via > the default route. > Why doesn't it? What makes you think it doesn't? Everything depends on what else is in your routing table. Show us the output of `netstat -ran'. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | Shashish is simple, it's discreet, it's brief. ... wollman@lcs.mit.edu | Shashish is the bonding of hearts in spite of distance. Opinions not those of| It is a bond more powerful than absence. We like people MIT, LCS, ANA, or NSA| who like Shashish. - Claude McKenzie + Florent Vollant
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9502152014.AA12499>