From owner-cvs-all Sun Jul 16 16:18:30 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA36E37B931; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA94197; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Will Andrews , Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven , Hajimu UMEMOTO , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/gkrellm/files md5 In-Reply-To: <20000716182932.I51462@jade.chc-chimes.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > Besides which, your logic is flawed. Since we cannot audit all source code > > in the tree, we should audit none of it? *Anything* we catch is a win. > > At what cost of resources? What happens when someone (either the legit author > or the Bad Guy who added the backdoor) runs indent(1) on the code too? If > it's easy to see what changed then I'll mention it in my commits, but I'm not > going to spend any great amount of time just to find out that the author now > likes to use some different style or that he slipped in a few bugfixes. If it's a significant change, then that's fine..just summarize what you make of it in the commitlogs. The point is you should at least eyeball it for anything which looks suspicious. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message