Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2000 23:10:00 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /usr/ports/ too big? Message-ID: <00021323153409.06543@nomad.dataplex.net> In-Reply-To: <20000213200645.A17462@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002122011480.97914-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <00021319291002.06543@nomad.dataplex.net> <20000213200645.A17462@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 06:18:02PM -0600, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > Quite likely because this arena is too obscure and cluttered with (to them) > > extraneous material. Of course, YOU object to it being discussed in forums > > where they are more likely to congregate. > > NO! The Handbook which *clearly* states Typical "backroom politics" strategy -- Advertise the "public" meeting only in the hall outside the executive washroom Then come forward with your report and truthfully state that "no one objected" And you are ignoring the fact that I advocate this strategy beyond the ports. Ports just happens to be the better place to demonstrate and refine the idea. -- Richard Wackerbarth rkw@Dataplex.NET To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00021323153409.06543>