Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 13:07:18 -0500 From: Jonathan Horne <jhorne@dfwlp.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache 2.2 showing version Message-ID: <200604291307.18425.jhorne@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <4453A96C.80105@daleco.biz> References: <20060429171602.81265.qmail@web31611.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200604291244.17959.jhorne@dfwlp.com> <4453A96C.80105@daleco.biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
no KDK, you were not incorrect. in fact, my answer should have included your information, and your answer should have included mine (ie, we were both a little short). the fact is, that both items should be considered when taming down that particular info that apache displays. ServerTokens specifies the verbosity, while ServerSignature allows it on, or eliminates it altogether. cheers, jonathan On Saturday 29 April 2006 12:59, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > take a look at the ServerTokens section of httpd.conf. > > > > # > > # ServerTokens > > # This directive configures what you return as the Server HTTP response > > # Header. The default is 'Full' which sends information about the OS-Type > > # and compiled in modules. > > # Set to one of: Full | OS | Minor | Minimal | Major | Prod > > # where Full conveys the most information, and Prod the least. > > # > > ServerTokens Full > > > > cheers, > > jonathan > > Oops --- foot in mouth disease here, methinks. I was looking > at a box with Apache 1.3.X ... > > Sorry, Aguiar .... :o > > KDK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200604291307.18425.jhorne>