From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Dec 11 21:23: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mail.enteract.com (mail.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D7D14BF5; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 21:23:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: from shell-3.enteract.com (dscheidt@shell-3.enteract.com [207.229.143.42]) by mail.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA31469; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 23:23:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 23:23:02 -0600 (CST) From: David Scheidt To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Jay Nelson , David Kelly , Brett Glass , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Log file systems? (Was: Re: dual 400 -> dual 600 worth it?) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Jay Nelson wrote: > > Finally, has anyone used soft updates with vinum? > > There should be no reason why it won't work, as they're orthogonal > systems. Again, check the archives. There were some issues with RAID-5 vinum and softupdates. I don't use vinum, so I don't know if they were fixed or not. David Scheidt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message