From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jun 23 6:51:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA92837C333 for ; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 06:51:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fpscha@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.via-net-works.net.ar (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA07596 for security@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:48:41 -0300 (GMT) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <200006231348.KAA07596@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> Subject: Passive FTP ports in ProFTPd To: security@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:48:40 -0300 (GMT) Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello: (I know I should be better off asking in some ProFTPd list, but I'm not subscribed right know to any of them and maybe somebody here faced the same troubles.) I switched to ProFTPd due to the wu-ftpd exploit posted today. The thing is, I used the "passive port " directive of wu-ftpd in order to match these ports in the firewall. Anybody knows how to achieve the same with ProFTPd? I couldn't find anything similar in the docs. Thanks! Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fernando@via-net-works.net.ar (54-11) 4323-3333 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message