From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 17 06:59:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2E916A402 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:59:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6196443D48 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id l8so467116nzf for ; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:59:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HYgv+xVxiCG94wj4RCgMaYCnJOuRw2zc+2eLAn7UBAfd6GXMf8uOmRavEycLYWmb6HwtFt/afm2NTfiK+koKi4alrvmxrjDvfVqgQguEwQTqabqn/ag5p47lZYU91mpzSqZhplG0P9xoalUS0ZQcXTrp08CxeeQaK+oLTmMLnQw= Received: by 10.36.108.15 with SMTP id g15mr5849133nzc; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.37.22.74 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 23:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:59:10 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: "Erich Dollansky" In-Reply-To: <44430610.6010704@pacific.net.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200604151313.32519.benlutz@datacomm.ch> <4441199C.4090802@carebears.mine.nu> <44415038.4020101@jamesbailie.com> <8664l991pf.fsf@xps.des.no> <44430610.6010704@pacific.net.sg> Cc: James Bailie , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is not more FreeBSD software written in C++? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 06:59:11 -0000 On 4/17/06, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > James Bailie writes: > >> Efficiency is of prime importance in systems programming. The > >> only language in which one can write more efficient programs than > >> in C, is assembler, but it's not portable. > > > > This is a myth. I'm surprised to see it a Lisp programmer perpetuate > > it is a myth that assembler is not portable? No, obviously the other thing.