From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 15 23:10:40 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B464106566B;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69848FC17;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n5FN7V5c077571;
	Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:07:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:07:54 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20090615.170754.1399854812.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: mav@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A2AF876.1030103@FreeBSD.org>
References: <6657.1244328220@critter.freebsd.dk> <4A2AF876.1030103@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: WIP: ATA to CAM integration
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:10:40 -0000

In message: <4A2AF876.1030103@FreeBSD.org>
            Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> writes:
: Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
: > In message <4A294DC3.5010008@mavhome.dp.ua>, Alexander Motin writes:
: >> I think ATAPI disk device is theoretically possible, but I believe it 
: >> does not exist in practice, as industry do not need it. 
: > 
: > Maxtor ZIP ?
: 
: May be, never had an ATA version. But it is more FDD, then HDD. Also it 
: existed in Parallel Port and SCSI versions, so it could be done in ATAPI 
: way just for unification.

There was a ata/atapi version too.  It attaches to afd.

Warner