Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Dec 2017 12:06:52 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net>
To:        Ted Hatfield <ted@io-tx.com>, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc:        Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh <sunpoet@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Procmail got updated!
Message-ID:  <5A389E6C.8040108@grosbein.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1712181824220.10261@io-tx.com>
References:  <alpine.BSF.2.21.1712181012470.92288@aneurin.horsfall.org> <a3a1097d-22c7-89cc-dd69-b4ceeebf7228@gmx.de> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1712181824220.10261@io-tx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
19.12.2017 7:30, Ted Hatfield wrote:
> 
> 
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Matthias Andree wrote:
> 
>> Am 18.12.2017 um 00:17 schrieb Dave Horsfall:
>>> Doing my regular update, and...
>>>
>>>     Upgrading procmail from 3.22_9 to 3.22_10...
>>>
>>> Good grief; who's the masochist who volunteered to support this
>>> obscure insecure and hitherto-unsupported scripting language?
>>>
>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=455800
>>
>> I'd agree we should pull the plug on the package. We'll be in for the
>> usual "but it works for me" screaming of the irresponsible people who
>> don't care (and most of them won't know that they need to write the
>> exception/error handling themselves in their .procmailrc recipes).
>>
>> Sunpoet, can we mark the port as deprecated given that even the upstream
>> once said it should best be abolished? I can't find the reference now,
>> the procmail.org website displays "Site hosting in transit, information
>> will be back up shortly."
>>
> 
> Dear Matthias,
> 
> As one of the "irresponsible" people who is still using procmail on our systems and has built an number of scripts and customer infrastructure around it I take exception to the term irresponsible.  Perhaps the better word is overworked.  If I had the time to move to dovecot/sieve or maildrop as a local delivery agent I would have done so by now.
> 
> Ted Hatfield

+1





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A389E6C.8040108>