From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:41:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B8F16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:41:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53ECD43D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:41:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pho@holm.cc) Received: (qmail 19372 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2004 16:41:28 -0000 Received: from 0x50a43fc7.hknxx1.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk (HELO peter.osted.lan) (80.164.63.199) by relay.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 16:41:28 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 80.164.63.199 Received: from peter.osted.lan (localhost.osted.lan [127.0.0.1]) by peter.osted.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91GfRV7002534; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:41:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho@peter.osted.lan) Received: (from pho@localhost) by peter.osted.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i91GfR6i002533; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:41:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pho) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:41:27 +0200 From: Peter Holm To: Stephan Uphoff Message-ID: <20041001164127.GA2468@peter.osted.lan> References: <1095468747.31297.241.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096477932.3733.1471.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096489576.3733.1868.camel@palm.tree.com> <200409291652.29990.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1096496057.3733.2163.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096603981.21577.195.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096608201.21577.203.camel@palm.tree.com> <20041001141040.GA1556@peter.osted.lan> <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Peter Holm cc: Julian Elischer cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:41:48 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:13:14PM -0400, Stephan Uphoff wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 10:10, Peter Holm wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:23:21AM -0400, Stephan Uphoff wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 00:13, Stephan Uphoff wrote: > > > > > > > I also had overlooked > > > > http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons80.html > > > > Showing that my patch for kern_switch.c (switch_patch) has a bug. > > > > I will send an updated patch later today. > > > > > > OK - here is the promised patch. > > > > > > > For once I'm the bearer of good news. The switch_patch_v2 + the > > sched_4bsd patch ran the tests for more than one hour without > > any freeze. The sched_4bsd alone did not stop the freezes. I'm > > now testing the switch_patch_v2 alone and it's looking good for > > 55+ minutes of testing. > > Great ! > I guess I should roll a cleaned up cumulative patch soon. > > Stephan With switch_patch_v2 alone a freeze occured after more than one hour. So now I'm back to testing switch_patch_v2 + sched_4bsd. I'd let that run for a while, just to be sure. -- Peter Holm