From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec 21 19:28:56 2000
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Dec 21 19:28:54 2000
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E196437B400
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 21 Dec 2000 19:28:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dan@localhost)
	by dan.emsphone.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eBM3SgL08976;
	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:28:42 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from dan)
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 21:28:42 -0600
From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@emsphone.com>
To: John Indra <john@naver.co.id>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: hwclock
Message-ID: <20001221212842.B29796@dan.emsphone.com>
References: <20001222101420.A2426@naver.co.id>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <20001222101420.A2426@naver.co.id>; from "John Indra" on Fri Dec 22 10:14:20 GMT 2000
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT
Sender: dan@dan.emsphone.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In the last episode (Dec 22), John Indra said:
> What's the command that serves similar purpose as the Linux command
> hwclock does?

It's not needed, as FreeBSD always keeps the hardware clock in synch
with the kernel.

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@emsphone.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message