From owner-freebsd-advocacy Sun Feb 28 21:20:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from postman.bayarea.net (postman.bayarea.net [205.219.84.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E6B152FC for ; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:19:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Dave@Yost.com) Received: from [205.219.69.138] (205-219-69-138.bayarea.net [205.219.69.138]) by postman.bayarea.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA22732; Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:19:08 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Sender: dayost@mail.bayarea.net Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <199903010058.QAA24952@pike.cdrom.com> References: Your message of "Sat, 27 Feb 1999 16:56:06 PST." Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 21:18:20 -0800 To: "Robert A. Bruce" From: Dave Yost Subject: Re: The Linux PR firestorm disaster (w.r.t. FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG, rab@pike.cdrom.com Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:58 PM -0800 1999-02-28, Robert A. Bruce wrote: > So if you can send me a list of areas where FreeBSD beats Linux, > I would greatly appreciate it. If you can back up any claims > of better performance/reliability with published reports or > repeatable benchmarks, that would be great. But I am happy to > take anecdotes too. Sorry. I've been going on extensive hearsay. You guys who use these heavily will have to come up with the comparison. > The chart is pretty sparse right now, so > I am not picky. Gee, is linux really the better one as well as the most publicized? Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message