From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 13:34:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FA51065673 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212578FC16 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 13:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.135.100] (c-76-126-155-117.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.155.117]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p4ODYoZg037200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 06:34:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4DDBB3F7.20303@feral.com> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 06:34:47 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]); Tue, 24 May 2011 06:34:52 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: iscsi_initiator and tag opening problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:34:53 -0000 First of all, the target is broken here, but okay. Secondly, you, as the entity forming up PDUs and BHS entities can put whatever tag you want in it, no? The DA driver uses an ordered tag every now and then (foolishly- there's a sysctl to turn that off). On 5/24/2011 5:00 AM, Daniel Braniss wrote: > Hi all, > I'm having problems with particular iscsi-targets, which when increasing > the tag opening above 1, will crash the target. The developers are > saying that they do suport tagged queuing, but > > 'do not support task-set management (which is what initiator side > attempts at controlling target side execution ordering is called)' > > So, since I'm the iscsi_initiator developer, is there any way that I can tell > the CAM to keep it SIMPLE as opposed to ORDERED? > Sorry, my knowledge of ISCSI stopped at version 2 :-) > > thanks, > danny > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"