From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 10:55:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51D0106564A for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3098FC14 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:55:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1StGIv-0000tP-EK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:55:57 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1343040957437-5729157.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <1343037776471-5729143.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:55:58 -0000 > However, after formatting it in Windows why duplicate it again in > FreeBSD? Just to check if it works as should, also trim sectors and whatever. Format without partition table? But in this case, no 1 reason was probably most important. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/da0-40-000MB-s-transfers-What-was-rationale-behind-pegging-USB-2-0-at-40MB-s-tp5729028p5729157.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.