Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:42:24 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Paul Eggert <eggert@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Cc:        freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com, bug-bison@gnu.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject:   Re: portability fix for bison-1.75
Message-ID:  <20060122044224.GA81690@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <87u0bymq7x.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
References:  <200601131825.SAA21164@sopwith.solgatos.com> <87r772obn8.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu> <20060120211940.GA43031@xor.obsecurity.org> <87u0bymq7x.fsf@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 03:31:14PM -0800, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
>=20
> > Unfortunately there is a lot of software that cannot be used as-is
> > with the newer version.  This seems to be because the newer versions
> > of bison are not backwards-compatible, which is irritating to say the
> > least.
>=20
> That's news to me.  Has anyone filed a bug report about these
> irritating backward-compatibility issues to <bug-bison@gnu.org>?

I don't know about that, but I reran the build of all of our ~160
ports that use bison-1.75, with bison-2.1 instead.

> Possibly the backward-compatibility problems, whatever they were, have
> already been fixed.  In that case I'd still recommend that people not
> use 1.75, as it has some real bugs.

Almost all of the ports built, which is a big improvement over the
last time this was tried - but there are still two failures:

lang/pike70 (ftp://ftp.oav.net/pike/7.0/)

security/bro (ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/)

Perhaps these are the fault of the software depending on old bison
bugs, but until they're both fixed (either by a patch to the software
or a fix to bison) we can't switch any of the ports over to bison-2.1,
since these two bison versions try to install on top of one another,
so users will end up with a random version of bison which may or may
not work.

Kris


--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFD0w0wWry0BWjoQKURAp4ZAKDKmM70aTnAIuQxNuLw7TuP03tfUwCg4HXk
eux9KdQDbuu3MWHM/JGs+l8=
=GuS1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060122044224.GA81690>