From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 2 00:14:01 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA04595 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:12:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA04581 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 00:12:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id RAA20994; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 17:12:27 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36B62F2F.99B407F0@newsguy.com> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 07:48:15 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wolfskill CC: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more modular rc/init/uninit system... References: <199902012228.OAA12331@pau-amma.whistle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On a more humorous note... David Wolfskill wrote: > > So switch the logic: the "foo" script should be able to tell a > sufficiently interested inquirer what services it depends on. Yeah, but how would you qualify "sufficiently"? For instance, would it be enough to ask "please", or would the interested party have to beg on their knees? :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com She just looked at him over the rotating pencil like, how slow can a mammal be and still have respiratory functions? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message