Date: 13 Feb 2000 21:49:50 -0800 From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Torsten Blum <torstenb@vmunix.org> Subject: Re: zsh re-org Message-ID: <vqcwvo8ib9c.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Bill Fumerola's message of "Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:21:44 -0500" References: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> <m12Jhwl-000OSPC@onizuka.vmunix.org> <20000212182711.A42371@dragon.nuxi.com> <vqcu2jcrc88.fsf@bubble.didi.com> <20000213212144.S92177@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> * I'd only point out the objections are all FUD related to the fact that the * authors label one beta and one release. I'd compare it to GIMP where the * development version is actually more stable the then "stable" or "release" * version. It is (as cpiazza pointed out) backwards compatible. Well ok, if you guys want to discuss this rationally and calmly, I have no problem with that. But don't get into the "don't you dare step on my toes" p*ssing contest or I'm going to slap y'all with a big stick. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcwvo8ib9c.fsf>