From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Apr  2 15:41: 7 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F173937B419
	for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Tue,  2 Apr 2002 15:41:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pool0045.cvx22-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.198.45] helo=mindspring.com)
	by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16sXtG-0007DT-00; Tue, 02 Apr 2002 15:40:39 -0800
Message-ID: <3CAA415F.E8EEACF6@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 15:40:15 -0800
From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony}  (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
Cc: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>,
	Anthony Atkielski <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>,
	freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Anti-Unix Site Runs Unix
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020401153352.02b99760@nospam.lariat.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20020401184152.00e3ed10@nospam.lariat.org> <002d01c1da0d$f4043130$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20020402081116.00e369a0@nospam.lariat.org> <20020402173202.P49279@lpt.ens.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-chat.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-chat>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-chat>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> Brett Glass wrote:
> > >You're running a version that contains thousands of bugs and was obsolete
> > >years ago.
> >
> > It's no more buggy than anything else out there.
> 
> Well, how does it perform on, for example,
> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/CSS1/current/  ?
> 
> If it doesn't handle it right, it's not standard compliant, it's
> buggy, period.  I haven't used IE but from what I've read IE (5 and
> up) is far more standards-compliant than NS 4.  Mozilla/NS6 do handle
> this stuff right.

Why don't we raise the standards bar further?

If it doesn't support HTTP/1.1 request pipelining, then it's crap.

I guess that leaves us with Opera as the only viable browser?  IE
claims to support it, but it doesn't actually do it correctly.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message