From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 15 01:13:35 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D3C1065792
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:13:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73BA8FC12
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:13:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAF1DPBl068917
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:13:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAF1DPtl068916; 
	Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:13:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com
	(4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA04055; Mon, 14 Nov 11 17:04:32 PST
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:04:18 -0800
From: perryh@pluto.rain.com
To: patfbsd@davenulle.org
Message-Id: <4ec21d02.DIq3JznJ4WBtwCd7%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References: <20111110123919.GF2164@hoeg.nl>
	<4EBC4B6E.4060607@FreeBSD.org> <20111111112821.GP2164@hoeg.nl>
	<4EBDC06F.6020907@FreeBSD.org> <20111112103918.GV2164@hoeg.nl>
	<4EBF0003.3060401@FreeBSD.org> <20111113091940.GX2164@hoeg.nl>
	<4EC04B65.4030801@FreeBSD.org> <20111114092922.GA2164@hoeg.nl>
	<20111114172609.1c2aeb0a@davenulle.org>
In-Reply-To: <20111114172609.1c2aeb0a@davenulle.org>
User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ed@80386.nl, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin'
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:13:35 -0000

Patrick Lamaiziere <patfbsd@davenulle.org> wrote:

> I would like to keep /usr/local for ports only.
> When things are going wrong with ports it is sometimes
> easier to rm -rf /usr/local and rebuild all from scratch.

When using this approach -- which I agree makes sense --
where should one put truly local (non-ports) executables
(/usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin being reserved for
ports executables)?