From owner-freebsd-current Thu Apr 15 1:57:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466A914EA6 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 01:57:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id RAA05470; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:50:41 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <3715A168.B193834E@newsguy.com> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 17:20:56 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: alk@pobox.com Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: swap-related problems References: <14100.61923.427423.153188@avalon.east> <1892.924120059@critter.freebsd.dk> <14100.62842.127882.239452@avalon.east> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anthony Kimball wrote: > > Quoth Poul-Henning Kamp on Wed, 14 April: > : > : 1. Demonstrate the need. > > Well, it's only needed if you want to be able to reliably execute ANSI > C code according to spec. I personally don't care. I'd be surprised > if core didn't though. I would suspect that it would be deemed worthy > of someone's p2 queue, at least. FreeBSD executes ANSI C code reliably according to spec, as long as there is enough memory in the system. If there isn't, FreeBSD doesn't run reliably, much less executes any kind of code reliably. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "Well, Windows works, using a loose definition of 'works'..." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message