From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 12 00:18:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA17397 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:18:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dview.roma.reuters. (net144-089.mclink.it [195.110.144.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA17392 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:18:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from masotti@mclink.it) Received: from gatekeeper (gatekeeper [192.168.100.249]) by dview.roma.reuters. (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA07688; Mon, 12 Oct 1998 09:22:06 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3621BBB4.284797A9@mclink.it> Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 08:20:04 +0000 From: Marco Masotti X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Dekkers CC: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: NAT vs. MASQUERADING (e.g. FBSD vs. Linux) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Paul Dekkers wrote: >I've tested once nat with just loopback and it seemed a lot slower I agree, still a few months ago the NAT ppp was slow and buggy, especially with some applications, one for all is Quake. Slowness with Quake is an hard experience, you know :-) Don't know with linux masquerading though. -Marco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message