From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 10 23:02:25 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id XAA24058 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 23:02:25 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net (root@wsantee.oz.net [204.118.240.207]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA24052 for ; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 23:02:22 -0700 Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id XAA00983 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Oct 1995 23:02:17 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199510110602.XAA00983@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: Predictor-1 compression benchmarking To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Oct 1995 23:02:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 716 Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk 'Lo all: Are there any benchmarks floating around comparing throughput and CPU utilization with Predictor-1 compression enabled for ppp vs. using standard v.42bis compression on the modem. My provider currently doesn't have support enabled for Predictor-1 compression (I'm not even sure they have a daemon which implements it) and I'd like to present a case why they should/shouldn't enable it for their subscribers. Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net (preferred) | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( wsantee@oz.net (backup) \------------------------------ ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee finger wsantee@oz.net for PGP info )