Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 11 Dec 1999 01:47:30 GMT
From:      mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa)
To:        pons@gmx.li (pons)
Cc:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Router
Message-ID:  <3851ac5d.1297084769@mail.sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <MAIL385148CC.93A8E2D0@gmx.li>
References:  <MAIL385148CC.93A8E2D0@gmx.li>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10 Dec 1999 14:10:06 -0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.isp you wrote:

>Hi
>
>Our Company preforms the MIS for 250x remote locations .
>We would like to provide a leased line WAN that connects
>all 250 to main office. 50 of them would have an analog 
>dial-up via 56k modem as a backup.
>
>  
>Which Routes would be the best (cost, preformance, security)
>can be used to provide LAN and WAN connection on the 
>server and client site?

Well, have a look at some of the mailing lists and newsgroups devoted to
terminal servers.  We use Lucent PM3s, and they are OK.  We are evaluating
a Cisco AS5300, and it has comprable modem performance, but many more
features... but it also costs more.  Unless you like weekly software
updates, I would stay away from Ascend.  Some people however really like
them, so get a few opinions.  www.data.com also has a fairly extensive
review, but be read the methodology.  To an ISP world, the modem
performance is somewhat irrelavant in that ISPs dont see such a homogeneous
environment.

	---Mike
Mike Tancsa  (mdtancsa@sentex.net)		
Sentex Communications Corp,   		
Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
"Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers 
could setup a national IP network." (KDW2)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3851ac5d.1297084769>