From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 15:44:12 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 801E37FC for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (smtp1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446631BF9 for ; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 9F9D020E7088C; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:44:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.multiplay.co.uk X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.2 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DOS_OE_TO_MX, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,RDNS_DYNAMIC,STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from r2d2 (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.141.170]) by smtp1.multiplay.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336AC20E70886; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 15:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Borja Marcos" , "FreeBSD-scsi" References: Subject: Re: Samsung 840 Pro SSD and quirks Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 16:44:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:44:12 -0000 We saw a noticable performance increase on 4k on our 8TB 840 array but I too couldn't find any concrete information either. If anyone has this info and can confirm either way that would be great. Regards Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Borja Marcos" > > Hi, > > I have just noticed that the Samsung 840 SSDs now have the 4 KB block > quirk added. > > Is this really the case? I've been playing with them some time ago and > I didn't notice performance differences between using ZFS on them > either > "directly" (advertised 512 byte blocks) or forcing 4 KB blocks using > gnop. > > Just surprised, I didn't find references to the true block size.