From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 29 10:31:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from blackhelicopters.org (geburah.blackhelicopters.org [209.69.178.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0605514E4F for ; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 10:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by blackhelicopters.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA24380; Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:30:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) From: Michael Lucas Message-Id: <199911291830.NAA24380@blackhelicopters.org> Subject: Re: missing X library? In-Reply-To: <3842C3ED.275AEECC@bigfoot.com> from Jonathon McKitrick at "Nov 29, 1999 1:20:29 pm" To: j_mckitrick@bigfoot.com (Jonathon McKitrick) Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 13:30:32 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Well, you were right... i reinstalled X and all seems to be OK. We'll see. I > guess i really need to pay more attention and find out what is going on in my > linux compat directory. I didn't think i would need any linux X support if i > already had it in FreeBSD. That seems redundant. Yes, it does. However you might find: %grep -i libx /var/db/pkg/linux_base-5.2/+CONTENTS interesting. Anyone know if there is a particular reason why linux_base includes a chunk of X? Is there some issue with Linux binaries expecting Linux X? ==ml To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message