From owner-freebsd-chromium@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 14:41:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: chromium@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64D8106566C for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from geo.liaskos@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B4F8FC12 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz30 with SMTP id z30so2030100qad.13 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:41:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=ONF/9DePtOamzrLz5dnzLaG97WqsIugCheryrh9cKIE=; b=RBJ8xe1wf7OfH+viO9yDc0JzsGqbLxnp1a4f2gTaDFE5NXY6WspHI8ETWL2AaSS4wA V4UGXE0IM9kTzPwIHFErbsKE3VODchDkML7RnHsEupTf+XuOGpUnxMROgMgvZcxLaLXU BKfU+f2rNY1nE23Z2cu+xB3g8lv2Vs5GsP6iY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.174.68 with SMTP id s4mr13074513qaz.4.1318776096186; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:41:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.47.74 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Oct 2011 07:41:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 17:41:36 +0300 Message-ID: From: George Liaskos To: FreeBSD Ports , chromium@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: CFT Chromium 15.0.874.92 X-BeenThere: freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 14:41:38 -0000 On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 5:34 PM, George Liaskos wrote: > Hello, > > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-20111016.tar.xz > http://cybertron.gr/chromium-15.0.874.92.tbz > Meh, sorry about that. I pushed send by mistake. What i meant to write was : please test Chromium 15.0.874.92 :) There are many people that report problems with the current version of Chromium in ports. I believe that this revision of the port should resolve most of the issues but it would be really nice if we have more feadback. The package is for 9 amd64 compiled with gcc45. Regards, George