From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Apr 18 20:13:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from clink.schulte.org (clink.schulte.org [209.134.156.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558E237B417 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 20:13:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarmap.nospam.schulte.org (tarmap.schulte.org [209.134.156.198]) by clink.schulte.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACA02442F; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:13:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020418221122.01585c70@pop3s.schulte.org> X-Sender: (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 22:13:47 -0500 To: Radhika Sambamurti , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Schulte Subject: Re: Ethernet card for freebsd 4.4 In-Reply-To: <20020419030247.49286.qmail@web9307.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 08:02 PM 4/18/2002 -0700, Radhika Sambamurti wrote: >Today, i bought the Linksys LNE100TX, (apparently ver 5.0), >which is not being recognized by dmesg. I've got scads of version 4.1 of the LNE100TX, they come up like this. dc0: port 0xec00-0xecff mem 0xd7800000-0xd78003ff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0 dc0: Ethernet address: 00:03:6d:16:8c:16 miibus0: on dc0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto I can't believe version 5 wouldn't work. Is is based on the same chipset? Perhaps you're having some sort of IRQ conflict. >thanks, >radhika > >===== >It's all a matter of perspective. You can choose your view by choosing >where to stand. >--Larry Wall -- Christopher Schulte http://www.schulte.org/ Do not un-munge my @nospam.schulte.org email address. This address is valid. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message