From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Mar 15  7:35:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8994E37B718
	for <FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 15 Mar 2001 07:35:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
	by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA46144;
	Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:35:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wollman)
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:35:06 -0500 (EST)
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Message-Id: <200103151535.KAA46144@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Racoon Problem & Cisco Tunnel
In-Reply-To: <20010315013955.A28471@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
References: <3AACF40D.4080504@Talarian.Com>
	<000801c0ab8b$81d99ca0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com>
	<20010313104927.A59404@darkstar.gte.net>
	<20010315013955.A28471@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

<<On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 01:39:55 -0800, "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> said:

> Damn straight; we've know all of this from the e begining.

There is an I-D circulating by Keith Moore which goes into
substantially more detail the particular kinds of applications which
either don't work through a NAT, or require the NAT to be able to pick
apart the protocol.  AIR it's titled ``What NATs Break''.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message