Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:35:06 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc:        FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Racoon Problem & Cisco Tunnel
Message-ID:  <200103151535.KAA46144@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20010315013955.A28471@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
References:  <3AACF40D.4080504@Talarian.Com> <000801c0ab8b$81d99ca0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> <20010313104927.A59404@darkstar.gte.net> <20010315013955.A28471@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 01:39:55 -0800, "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net> said:

> Damn straight; we've know all of this from the e begining.

There is an I-D circulating by Keith Moore which goes into
substantially more detail the particular kinds of applications which
either don't work through a NAT, or require the NAT to be able to pick
apart the protocol.  AIR it's titled ``What NATs Break''.

-GAWollman


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103151535.KAA46144>