Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:30:11 GMT From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91368 xephem patch Message-ID: <200601061130.k06BUBDM089174@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/91368; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Josh Paetzel <josh@tcbug.org> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, frank@dynamical-systems.org Subject: Re: ports/91368 xephem patch Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:24:24 +1100 On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 01:32:41AM -0600, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I have passed this patch on to the xephem developers and they said > they will consider it. In the meantime they do not want us to patch > the FreeBSD port. If you want the patch in, we can add it to the port and set it to NO_PACKAGE which means that the compiled port doesn't show up in the distribution sites. That way we comply with their prerequisites while still are able to add these kind of things to the ports. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200601061130.k06BUBDM089174>