From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Jun 21 19:16:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F967AC5C2C for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAECE2F6A for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etnapierala@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id h129so39065065lfh.1 for ; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:16:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0PnT2fZhWff53V1MdaqY2u9lL2ESonGlTopR4TUFY5k=; b=Lmgv/FrRW+LI1ZNQIbF+8yuZNUreAPcJ9/CD+3VZryb+jIWCQet9NdumK7GRZw+tDD AupUvtKR+M9g/F70p5zLDOWaL3E9XkaRHMcFxuyuUr9OdeSd+sydZeu8aqSk23E5bAcZ t2KwUAGANN4AjPBvMNaOGKS8zPBSWwwzkj13TlDX3M9hMNlDrJxdDP82qQ5dza6AA9Ho yZssLeC/9iu7RJmBONT937pIwxniP4v/4UFlC7WTDwUMqHSDzGKEDk0AOQaSxb3dSKye 5PfPfzHmPNTom9STfbynk+IbN1XvTkj6v1tjZw99ey4+wVsy1NQzTWw42/8DgDt5cyw3 UmrQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=0PnT2fZhWff53V1MdaqY2u9lL2ESonGlTopR4TUFY5k=; b=dwmUCgvXgyK/8pGxtKo4PnWvDKt7C2882WieCYmSaQuANg6G4cejotWXgglCjC1buh 6mOeEaM5jFpaYZJ5grSgDOVp8Sp8h2c61qoGxa+p6/DjmOaoPK1TimmU6pP0p5tULtmu h9T8gQ4MnPxpCpGCtil1xZAKbwhRNs9qFV8AO73J7uThtfUJ6OlkSaiSBP1rJXgExEs7 /PK9b8KdNI2h4SNIz1j+UCFSO6PBH3txvsDn1iJDwB3YsxO0ZaoFD3otfMo11fjpouQX lrPnIG2j3yCxJLMshysLpNoK4ZJolwLH1m79E8e11oGQlYCqNiYRolGnILwvjcr/9FVc 0O8A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIXhiV2/MfJ0OjU+gfrvb9r39WYLt+Jfhq72pmOkfMNlUG4XAvv23TBuaSw8QhoqQ== X-Received: by 10.28.17.132 with SMTP id 126mr4705684wmr.90.1466536609925; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.20] (acyt159.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl. [83.11.203.159]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f140sm4302499wmf.22.2016.06.21.12.16.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:16:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: =?UTF-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Enabling OFED by default. From: =?utf-8?Q?Edward_Tomasz_Napiera=C5=82a?= X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13F69) In-Reply-To: <155742f5696.10b23e0dc206113.7147700460165953862@nextbsd.org> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 21:16:39 +0200 Cc: Hans Petter Selasky , Oded Shanoon , Meny Yossefi , "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7B5CD331-4C63-44BB-AAA8-13B5E497DBB7@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160211205358.GA3567@brick.home> <56D811B3.6090406@selasky.org> <20160305155620.GB2512@brick.home> <56DC00EA.7050900@selasky.org> <20160523102055.GA2891@brick> <1556f5196ad.cc101c73136103.7671428586181101222@nextbsd.org> <36219e68-a6cd-de7c-f318-b6a65543a087@selasky.org> <155742f5696.10b23e0dc206113.7147700460165953862@nextbsd.org> To: Matthew Macy X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:16:52 -0000 Dnia 21.06.2016 o godz. 20:18 Matthew Macy napisa=C5=82(= a): >=20 >=20 >=20 > ---- On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:48:26 -0700 Hans Petter Selasky wrote ----=20 >>> On 06/20/16 21:37, Matthew Macy wrote:=20 >>> Sorry, this got sorted in to spam.=20 >>>=20 >>> Do not enable in tree linuxkpi by default. It will definitely interfere w= ith out of tree graphics work, which would harm far far more users than it b= enefits.=20 >>>=20 >>> If anything GENERIC needs to be getting smaller. Please do not do this. I= t is an all around bad idea.=20 >>>=20 >>> -M >>=20 >> The final goal should be to make the DRM2 LinuxKPI an extension of the =20= >> kernel's LinuxKPI so that they can co-exist. >=20 > Sure. But that's not going to happen by 11 or probably even 11.1.=20 Well, in any case it would be too late to enable it in 11.0-RELEASE anyway.