Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Jun 2012 08:02:01 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us>
To:        Thomas Mueller <mueller23@insightbb.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: MPSAFE VFS -- List of upcoming actions
Message-ID:  <alpine.GSO.2.01.1206300751060.10821@freddy.simplesystems.org>
In-Reply-To: <43.6E.23439.7DD7EEF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>
References:  <43.6E.23439.7DD7EEF4@smtp02.insight.synacor.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, Thomas Mueller wrote:
>
> I've been wondering about the status of XFS in (Free or other)BSD, 
> know it's in ports and is usable in Linux.
>
> I think you can even run Linux on XFS instead of ext(2,3 or 4)fs, or ReiserFS, or btrfs.

You can not only run Linux on XFS (which I do) but it is still likely 
the most reliable and consistently performant of the filesystems 
available in Linux because of its origin and its maturity.  XFS did 
not originate in Linux (it originated in SGI's Irix) so it should not 
surprise that Linux core developers are proponents of filesystems 
originally developed under Linux.

Regardless, a key value of *BSD supporting non-native filesystems is 
in order to be able to access filesystems created on other OSs.

XFS is a major filesystem so hopefully someone will volunteer to 
support it.

Bob
-- 
Bob Friesenhahn
bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer,    http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.01.1206300751060.10821>