Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 08:20:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Flowers <jflowers@peony.ezo.net> To: Stephen Hocking <shocking@houston.rr.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Running natd on more than one interface... Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009200818450.48594-100000@peony.ezo.net> In-Reply-To: <200009200242.e8K2gnG03719@bloop.craftncomp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes. Just use a separate process for each with different ports for the divert. This is useful inbound when you want the source of an external connection to have a local address. Jim Flowers <jflowers@ezo.net> #4 ranked ISP on C|NET #1 in Ohio On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Stephen Hocking wrote: > > I have a home network that talks to the world-at-large using natd to do the > address translation on my gateway machine. However, I've just started > tunneling (over an encrypted link) to another place using the tun interface. > I'd like to have it translated as well. Has anyone tried running natd on more > than one interface? > > > > Stephen > -- > The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor. > > "We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce > the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know > this is not true." Robert Wilensky, University of California > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009200818450.48594-100000>